It’s unclear whether the Trudeau government will hold a vote in the House of Commons for its planning peace operation(s).
The political advantages of holding the votes are many and the downsides are few in the short-term.
For the record, though, it’s important to recall that the Harper government only held votes for missions that were explicitly involved offensive operations.
Here’s a sample of Canadian military missions that weren’t brought to the Commons for a vote under the Harper government, because they weren’t combat operations or were tied to allied obligations:
The CAF training mission to Kabul, Afghanistan, 2011-2014 (Operation Attention).
The CAF’s support to French counterterrorism efforts in West Africa, 2015.
The CAF’s ongoing training mission in Ukraine (Operation UNIFER).
The deployment of naval forces and CF-18s to Central and Eastern Europe (Operation Reassurance).
The initial deployment of the CAF units to advise and assist local forces in Iraq, August-September 2014.
Were the Trudeau government to not hold a vote for a ‘peace’ mission, it would therefore be following the precedents set by its predecessor.
And I would also note that, despite what’s often assumed, the Liberals didn’t press for a vote on the advise and assist to Iraq in August-September 2014. They supported the mission without a vote until the issue of air strikes arose.